Netflix Review – The Haunting of Hill House (Spoiler-free)

I wrote this two weeks ago, when it would have been timely, then kept bumping it. So… hopefully this still works for some of you.

SpoilerFree

In 1959, Shirley Jackson wrote what is still considered to be one of the best horror stories of all time, famous for the relatively little amount of actual horror in it. “Horror” is usually defined as involving an actual scare or the feeling of revulsion and fear that comes after experiencing it, like what happens after you see Cthulhu or a Naked Steve Bannon. Instead, most of Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House was heavily reliant on feelings of dread and the emotional instability of the characters.

HillHouse - 1Book.png
Has Netflix adapted “The Lottery” yet? That might be interesting.

In 1963, this film was adapted into The Haunting by famed director Robert Wise (West Side Story, The Sound of Music, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Editor of Citizen Kane, etc.). The title changed to differentiate it from House on Haunted Hill. It was a solid terror film which managed to spend most of the movie making the characters, and the audience, uncertain if anything happening was supernatural or if it was all in the mind of the main character. It’s still regarded as a high point of cinema and is great upon rewatching. It’s not everyone’s favorite, mostly because it DOES rely heavily on dread rather than actual scares, but I personally love it.

HillHouse - 2MovieBW
Did I mention the director was amazing at dramatic shots?

In 1999, Jan de Bont, fresh off of Speed 2, remade the movie and it was so bad that Catherine Zeta-Jones wearing nearly nothing couldn’t help it. Granted, I was 12 when it came out, so I didn’t have that opinion at the time, but I have seen it since and, wow, it really was not well thought-out. Roger Ebert thought the production design was good, which… okay, I guess is true, but that’s not what I look for in a movie. However, it did work as a great basis for parody in Scary Movie 2.

HillHouse - 3MovieCZJ
Not even those… I mean She… could save this movie.

Well, this year Netflix decided to adapt it into a 10 episode TV series, the first one to be titled The Haunting of Hill House. While it had to change almost everything from all of the previous incarnations in order to fill the time, it captures the spirit of the book very well, despite being its own animal.

SUMMARY (Spoiler free)

Twenty-six years ago, the Crain family moved into Hill House. During their relatively short stay there, a large number of incidents involving the supernatural occurred, scaring and scarring every member of the family, before they were forced to flee after a particularly horrible event. Now, all of the family members are massively dysfunctional from the event and rarely communicate. However, after another family tragedy, they are all forced to confront the fact that none of them have ever fully left the house, resulting in them returning to resolve things.

HillHouse - 4Cast.jpg
Also, this house is haunted, if it’s real. If not, the computer that generated it is haunted.

END SUMMARY

If you’re a fan of horror, you need to watch this show. It’s one of the best collections of horror images you can get in 10 episodes. The designs of the ghosts are fantastic, but one of the best parts is that they’re so well hidden that you can miss them throughout entire scenes until the end, but they’ve been there the entire time.

HillHouse - 5Ghost.jpg
There’s a hidden ghost in this image. Try to find it.

The show is structured non-chronologically with many episodes containing events from both the past and present timelines running together, but this later becomes important to the story because some of the events don’t happen exactly chronologically either in the traditional sense. It ties the traumas of the past more directly with the issues that the Crains have in the present.

What’s really impressive about this show is that it doesn’t have any resemblance to the book whatsoever. The book and the original movie both contain a lot of hints that much of what’s going on is just in the head of the characters and that they’re letting their fears get the better of them. This show demonstrates ghosts about 10 minutes in and shows over a dozen of them. In that sense, it’s almost closer to *shudder* the 1999 reboot, but fortunately, it does everything right which that movie did wrong, while also doing more than the original film.

HillHouse - 6HughCrain.png
The TV series, for example, doesn’t have a terrible, giant CGI ghost.

Earlier I brought up how the book mostly focused on terror and dread over horror and revulsion. This show actually manages to do both at the same time, because we’re following two different timelines. We see the horror of the characters reacting to the past events and in flashbacks we see the terror building up to these events, but we also get the horror coming from present events that scare the characters, while also building up the terror of the inevitable return to the house that both the audience and the characters know is coming.

The family dynamics also really sell the show. All of the characters are dysfunctional and resentful towards each other, but each one also has some other defining element, whether it be a connection to ghosts, psychic abilities, or just being high as hell all the time. Each of these distinctions adds to the level of resentment and conflict between the characters, because they literally have something that the other parties can’t understand.

Overall, I can’t talk too much about the show without spoiling it, which has made this difficult, but it’s really a solid show. If you like horror, you’ll like this. If you don’t… you’ll probably hate it for making you spill your lukewarm broth that you have for every meal.

If you want to check out some more by the Joker on the Sofa, check out the 100 Greatest TV Episodes of All Time or the Joker on the Sofa Reviews

If you enjoy these, please, like, share, tell your friends, like the Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/JokerOnTheSofa/), follow on Twitter @JokerOnTheSofa, and just generally give me a little bump. I’m not getting paid, but I like to get feedback.

Netflix Review – The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society: Long Title, Great Movie

SpoilerFree

***One of my frequent complaints is that I don’t do movies that are easy to find. I’d point out that most of those movies were requested by other people, so I know how difficult they are to find, but whatever, I’m going to try and do more movies and shows that are easily accessible, mostly Netflix. So, this film’s on Netflix right now. Enjoy.***

If you can’t tell from the title, this movie is British. Like, super British. Like, The IT Crowd meets Downton Abbey level British, which also describes the cast’s previous roles. Most of it takes place in 1946 in Britain and on the Island of Guernsey, something I feel that you might not know exists unless you watched a lot of BBC. However, it’s an amazing period piece full of great performances.

GuernseyLiterary-1Cast.jpg
I don’t recommend the potato peel pie, but the literature is good.

SYNOPSIS (SPOILER-FREE)

Juliet Ashton (Lily “I’m Cinderella” James) is an author who is looking to write stories about the benefits of literature following the end of WWII. She is contacted by a man named Dawsey Adams (Michiel “I’m Daario Naharis” Huisman), who found a copy of a book by Charles Lamb (this is a real person and, if you knew that, have a treat) that previously belonged to her. They start talking through letters and she finds out that, during the Nazi occupation of the Island of Guernsey, locals formed a club called the “Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society” which served as their excuse to avoid the Nazi-imposed curfew. The Potato Peel Pie part is from one of the members making a pie out of potato peel since the citizens had nothing else to eat. Juliet heads to Guernsey to meet the members and discovers a number of surprising secrets about all of their lives and the lives of the people on the island recovering from the occupation.

GuernseyLiterary-2LilyJames.png

END SYNOPSIS

The movie’s based on a novel by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows that I read on a flight about 9 years ago. I don’t have it that fresh in my memory, but the plot points do seem to mostly match-up. The book is mostly an epistolary novel, though, so you get a lot out of the movie because of the difference in how the characters are approached. In the book, everything has to be filtered through the perspective of the author of the letter, but in the film, as you’d expect, most of the action in flashbacks is just presented to you. It makes it feel a little bit more like a detective story, rather than a series of recaps of deductions and findings that were already made.

GuernseyLiterary-4Book.jpg
Admit it, this is one classy book cover.

Every performance is pretty much spectacular, partially because the cast is phenomenal. James is likeable and upbeat and inquisitive without ever coming off as overbearing. The members of the Literary Society all have their own motivations and secrets which are conveyed well. Special mention has to go to Jessica Brown Findlay as Elizabeth McKenna, whose capture by the Nazis prompts much of the mystery. She’s not in it too much, but she manages to get across all that you will need from the character. Tom Courtenay, Katherine “I’m Jen from the IT Crowd” Parkinson, and Penelope “I’m Shaun’s mom in Shaun of the Dead” Wilton all shine in their parts as the other members of the Literary Society who used it as a way to cope with the reality of living under Nazi rule.

GuernseyLiterary-5ShaunsMom.jpg
Penelope Wilton does subtle very well. Lily James takes a different approach. Both work.

Without spoiling much, there’s a romantic subplot that is actually paced well, something that doesn’t happen much in any movie where it isn’t the focus. Hell, that’s impressive in films where it IS the focus.

GuernseyLiterary-3Romance.jpg
Hint: It’s probably not these two. Definitely probably maybe.

The drawback is that the film is about 2 hours long, which is about 20 minutes and 2 subplots longer than you needed, but it’s a period piece, so you should expect that and compensate by having wine nearby along with fancy foods from exotic places, like Dates or Brie or Whataburger. It’s not a wholly original film, but it’s still got enough emotional hooks and great moments that it’s worth watching. Let me put it this way, if you like Downton Abbey, you will love this film. Personally, I’m glad I saw it.

If you want to check out some more by the Joker on the Sofa, check out the 100 Greatest TV Episodes of All Time or the Joker on the Sofa Reviews

If you enjoy these, please, like, share, tell your friends, like the Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/JokerOnTheSofa/), follow on Twitter @JokerOnTheSofa, and just generally give me a little bump. I’m not getting paid, but I like to get feedback.